Health Lens dimensions

Intergroup Hostility

Dimension 102 of 1,100 · Health Lens

Excitement Index
0.0762

Intergroup Hostility measures the extent to which an expression conveys anger, rejection, prejudice, or antagonism directed at social groups, communities, or institutions tied to identity and belonging. It encompasses mild irritation and criticism as well as explicit bias, exclusion, and hostile social distancing.

evidence final name · Culture Lgb

Bands

Minimal Intergroup Hostility

Expressions activating this band contain little to no clear hostility toward a social group or identity-based community, instead focusing on neutral personal circumstances, values, or practical burdens. Any group-related content is incidental rather than antagonistic.

Low Intergroup Hostility

Expressions activating this band show irritation, anger, or criticism that is present but limited, often centered on interpersonal remarks, dissatisfaction, or diffuse frustration rather than sustained group-directed antagonism. Group or identity references may appear, but hostility is not yet the dominant organizing feature.

Moderate Intergroup Hostility

Expressions activating this band convey clear resentment or anger tied to how one is treated by institutions, communities, or relationship partners, with blame and grievance becoming more explicit. Identity-related regret, exclusion, or unfair treatment is directly named.

High Intergroup Hostility

Expressions activating this band present pronounced anger, alienation, or self-directed shame linked to social groups, identity communities, or institutional neglect. The expression frames group belonging or group response as a source of betrayal, conflict, or intense resentment.

Severe Intergroup Hostility

Expressions activating this band explicitly endorse prejudice, rejection, or avoidance toward identity-defined groups, or describe feeling directly rejected and harmed by such groups. Hostility is overt, categorical, and organized around social exclusion or stigmatizing beliefs.

Evidence summary

Candidate names

Culture Lgb74.70
Identity73.30
Culture Lgb Identity66.80
Culture63.50
Lgb Identity58.40

Sentence counts by range

B-7..B-4419
B-3..B33,709,656
B4542,191
B5..B11723,303
B12..B256,274

Dataset representation

01__health_reviews__druglib__benefits_effectiveness64
03__fact_checking__liar__truth_ordinal148
05__whole_disney_dataset__rating124
06__text_reviews__acl_imdb__binary_sentiment253
07__emotion_labels__goemotions_reddit__multilabel128
08__dialogue_emotion__empathetic_dialogues__context113
10__social_media_sentiment__sentiment140__binary176
11__consumer_complaints__response_explanation_vs_relief143

Anchor definitions

Minimal Culture Lgb

Minimal Culture Lgb: Culture lgb is present at a low level. Expressions activating this band reflect early or diffuse culture lgb.

Emerging Culture Lgb

Emerging Culture Lgb: Culture lgb is clearly present at this level. Unlike the band below, where culture lgb was characterized by a general or mixed form, the proxy here has shifted in character. Expressions activating this band reflect culture lgb at this level of intensity.

Elevated Culture Lgb

Elevated Culture Lgb: Culture lgb is present here in a general or mixed form without a single dominant facet. Unlike the band below, where culture lgb was characterized by a general form, the proxy here has shifted in character. The facets that dominated at lower levels have receded. Expressions activating this band may reflect general or diffuse culture lgb.

Severe Culture Lgb

Severe Culture Lgb: Culture lgb is clearly present at this level. Unlike the band below, where culture lgb was characterized by a general or mixed form, the proxy here has shifted in character. The facets that dominated at lower levels have receded. Expressions activating this band reflect culture lgb at this level of intensity.