Health Lens dimensions

Collective Efficacy

Dimension 218 of 1,100 · Health Lens

Excitement Index
0.0680

Collective Efficacy measures the perceived capacity of a group, partnership, or project to work together effectively, use resources well, and achieve meaningful outcomes. It encompasses collaborative functioning, influence, credibility, sustainability, and confidence that shared aims can be accomplished.

evidence final name · Primary Appraisals

Bands

Low Collective Efficacy

Expressions activating this band describe basic participation, membership, and willingness to work together, with emphasis on whether people are included, can speak up, and coordinate in simple team activity. The sense of shared capability is minimal and appears mainly as rudimentary cooperation or affiliation.

Moderate Collective Efficacy

Expressions activating this band describe a group that can carry out usual roles, exert some influence, and manage practical demands such as policies, resources, or financial risk. The shared capability is experienced as functional performance in everyday activities and decision contexts.

High Collective Efficacy

Expressions activating this band describe an actively productive partnership that involves members in dissemination, presentations, stakeholder connection, and mutual learning. The shared capability is experienced as recognized accomplishment, growing confidence, and effective contribution across visible collaborative tasks.

Very High Collective Efficacy

Expressions activating this band describe a group seen as legitimate, credible, well connected to decision-makers, and likely to sustain its work and achieve its primary aims. The shared capability is experienced as strong impact, effective use of financial resources, and confidence in consequential outcomes.

Evidence summary

Candidate names

Primary Appraisals45.40
Group Dynamics42.90
Appraisals37.90
Primary37.90
Dynamics37.30

Sentence counts by range

B-6..B-339,251
B-2..B44,932,153
B5..B69,633
B7..B13806

Dataset representation

01__health_reviews__druglib__benefits_effectiveness80
03__fact_checking__liar__truth_ordinal139
05__whole_disney_dataset__rating78
06__text_reviews__acl_imdb__binary_sentiment91
07__emotion_labels__goemotions_reddit__multilabel76
08__dialogue_emotion__empathetic_dialogues__context85
10__social_media_sentiment__sentiment140__binary88
11__consumer_complaints__response_explanation_vs_relief117

Anchor definitions

Minimal Primary Appraisals

Minimal Primary Appraisals: Primary appraisals is present at a low level. Expressions activating this band reflect early or diffuse primary appraisals.

Moderate Primary Appraisals

Moderate Primary Appraisals: Primary appraisals is clearly present at this level. Unlike the band below, where primary appraisals was characterized by a general or mixed form, the proxy here has shifted in character. Expressions activating this band reflect primary appraisals at this level of intensity.

Intense Primary Appraisals

Intense Primary Appraisals: Primary appraisals is present here in a general or mixed form without a single dominant facet. Unlike the band below, where primary appraisals was characterized by a general form, the proxy here has shifted in character. The facets that dominated at lower levels have receded. Expressions activating this band may reflect general or diffuse primary appraisals.

Peak Primary Appraisals

Peak Primary Appraisals: Primary appraisals is clearly present at this level. Unlike the band below, where primary appraisals was characterized by a general or mixed form, the proxy here has shifted in character. The facets that dominated at lower levels have receded. Expressions activating this band reflect primary appraisals at this level of intensity.