Peer Rejection
Dimension 832 of 1,100 · Health Lens
Peer Rejection measures the extent to which an expression reflects being excluded, devalued, avoided, or mistreated by other people in age-peer social settings. It encompasses social acceptance, invitations and friendship, as well as overt avoidance, discomfort, staring, and bullying.
evidence final name · Everyday Discrimination Eds-l
Absent Peer Rejection
Expressions activating this band do not convey a recognizable experience of peer treatment or social standing and instead contain unrelated procedural or administrative content.
Low Peer Rejection
Expressions activating this band reflect mild social evaluative concerns and mixed peer experiences, including sensitivity to others' judgments alongside some friendship, support, or coping in social situations.
Moderate Peer Rejection
Expressions activating this band reflect socially meaningful inclusion or exclusion in everyday peer life, such as being accepted, making friends, liking time with peers, or not being invited to join others.
High Peer Rejection
Expressions activating this band reflect clear interpersonal stigma and exclusion, with others appearing uncomfortable, avoiding contact, staring, acting mean, or bullying because of a salient personal condition.
Candidate names
Sentence counts by range
Dataset representation
Anchor definitions
Minimal Everyday Discrimination Eds-l: Expressions show no meaningful everyday discrimination eds-l content. The proxy is effectively absent. Expressions activating this band are unrelated to everyday discrimination eds-l.
Moderate Everyday Discrimination Eds-l: Everyday discrimination eds-l is experienced here at a level consistent with formal clinical assessment and disorder-relevant measurement. This is the first band where everyday discrimination eds-l becomes detectable. Expressions activating this band likely reflect everyday discrimination eds-l at a clinical or disorder-relevant level.
Intense Everyday Discrimination Eds-l: Everyday discrimination eds-l is experienced here at a level consistent with formal clinical assessment and disorder-relevant measurement. Compared to the band below, everyday discrimination eds-l is more intense and concentrated but retains the same essential character. Expressions activating this band likely reflect everyday discrimination eds-l at a clinical or disorder-relevant level.
Peak Everyday Discrimination Eds-l: Everyday discrimination eds-l is clearly present at this level. Unlike the band below, where everyday discrimination eds-l was characterized by the clinical form, the proxy here has shifted in character. The facets that dominated at lower levels have receded. Expressions activating this band reflect everyday discrimination eds-l at this level of intensity.
